Originally Posted By u/Brian_Ghoshery At 2025-03-17 09:33:30 PM | Source


  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How can you cancel a degree. It’s a proof of work and meeting requirements for graduation. You can’t “un-work” what they did.

    • heftig@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Only between the student and the university. Towards third parties, a degree is not a proof of work. It’s just a certification whose value depends on trust in the certifier. Of course they have the power to revoke it.

      There are more legitimate reasons they could do so, like if evidence of plagiarism is found after the degree was granted.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Isn’t this just cancel culture by the Right? The claim is that they are accused of “wrong think”.

    To be clear, I support the students’ right to protest, and a lot of cancel culture “victims” were rightly shunned for shitty takes or bad behaviors.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is it possible to check how many convicted thieves, rapists and/or murderers still hold their degrees? You know, just for fun, to see where their priorities are…

    • JoshCodes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d say check the nazis too but theyre more of the education by “faith” types than education by actual education.

      In all seriousness though, has a US university ever stripped a nazi or holocaust denyer of their degree? Surely that ideology is just as, if not more harmful?

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Reminds me of the lists of prohibited words universities would send to students that are banned.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think there are some cases, not these 22 students of course, but some cases that do warrant revoking a degree over moral implications. I’m rarely one to agree with blanket statements.

    • przemek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Imo such cases would be when someone can prove that you didn’t earn your degree honestly, or when you have amassed a history of academic dishonesty after the fact. But personally I don’t think crimes (even murder) should result in you losing your degree.

  • Creosm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Depends how they were protesting, if they were doing it peacefully this should be called out, but if they were causing property damage its understandable that they don’t want to associate with the students. The students should get compensation though.

    • guldukat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Palestine under attack: s’all good man

      Not liking it: hold on now, let’s take a closer look at why you dislike a genocide

    • GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why does it depend on how they were protesting? Why is violence relevant to a university degree in the first place?

      A degree should only be revoked in the case of cheating or other cases of gross scientific missconduct relating to said degree, no?

      For example, I think the unabomber was a terrible human being, but his crimes should be handled by the police. Not by the uneversites he worked for or got his degree from.

      This very much resembles some sort of social credit system.

      • guldukat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You’re speaking to a right-winger, a master of hypocrisy and doublethink. Don’t wear out your keyboard.

      • Creosm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You know what, you’re right. The university should only withhold or cancel their academic studies if the student was first found guilty through trial of violent protesting (or otherwise illegal forms of protesting). Otherwise the university shouldn’t have the authority to withhold it from them.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Innocent until proven guilty. No one should be expelled from ANY School for protesting

      Only until they have been found guilty of the crimes you mentioned.

      • Creosm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is exactly how I think it should be, unless they have substantial evidence to show they were violently protesting, there should be no repercussions for doing so.