• T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          2 days ago

          Usually, if the mouse is infected or mutated in a given manner, its innards would need to be removed and studied, to determine what effects the mutation/infection had on them. This kills the mouse.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 day ago

              Nah it’s like how if you touch A baby bird it’s mom won’t take it back, the body rejects the insidey bits when it has human funk on them.

          • Maeve@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            For some reason, I was under the impression not all infected mice were actually studied. Thanks so much for your kind reply.

            • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 hours ago

              It’s still a suffering animal, so we should get the most data we can out of every specimen. That should minimize the total amount of mice being used.

              Also only studying some mice can lead to biased results. Iirc in the pace trial participants who dropped out because the intervention worsened their condition where not included in the end result. With rats the researchers could just chose the healthiest ones and just claim they selected randomly.

              Rant:

              The pace trial was a horrible study on a chronic disease that was conducted by the british health system with the goal of denying care.
              The trial also had other systematic flaws like having a laxer definition of healthy at the end of the trial that at the beginning, meaning people who where sick enough to participate would be declared cured at the end even if nothing changed.
              This study is still used to denie people’s lived experience and just call them lazy.
              I don’t have a personal connection to any of this, but learning about it made me angry enough, that I must share this knowledge.

              • Maeve@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I do wish humans could find a humane way to do research in general. Thank you for sharing this. It’s a good reminder that life suffers and dies so we can live and I feel it would become us to remember that, for everything we consume.

        • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, in my opinion skinny pigs have been mutated in a harmful way, just not as a result of whatever tests they were subjected to. But if you have a pet scrotum, you can knit it little sweaters so it isn’t constantly shivering

        • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 days ago

          My sister did, you just need approval from some government offices so you don’t get mice that’ve had rabies-ebola-smallpox-anthrax tested on them getting out

          • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Oh shit forreal? I used to work in the NL and there it wasn’t allowed. You couldn’t even had rodents as pets because the possible dangers of contamination. I thought it was an EU thing actually, but maybe it’s just NL.

            Edit: not necessarily and EU thing but animal/test dependent actually.

            • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              It probably depends on what they were used for. I’m dutch too, but I did chemistry and civil engineering so I never used animals myself.

              • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Oh, yeah I was looking it up, and I think it might be just the general CCD protocols in our institution which al involve neuroscience, and those specifically are not up for adoption ,(couldnt find if this actually was from an EU thing, but prolly depends on the type of animal and intervention).

                And actually makes total sense. Some the relatively chil work in Wageningen with pets als falls under animal testing but it would feel wrong in those, mild cases.