• Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    That’s an instance ban. Instance bans automatically issue community bans for local communities the user has been active in.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Ada, drag is sorry for sharing the screenshots. Drag didn’t think they were anything serious. Drag won’t share any screenshots without permission again.

  • First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Already said it in !main@lemmy.blahaj.zone but I’ll say it again so others can see it here.

    It seems drag was banned from the site for sharing people’s DMs, though I’m sure that’s not the whole story, drag has a history of being banned for way more than just the thing on the label. Looking at the comments on drag’s home instance where it hasn’t been removed, it seems drag was sharing those DMs in attempt to libel Ada for not taking the action drag wanted. That’s on top of the fact that she did not give drag permission to share them. It’s an asshole move for sure, and I have to say if I were in Ada’s shoes I’d do the same.

    • exploitedamerican@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I believe transparency is desirable and the single party consent rule in regards to private conversations should be the primary accepted doctrine here outside of any communique that is sexual/private and includes nudes and or personal data and could constitute doxxing.

      • First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        That’s your opinion, but many people do not agree with you. I myself would be pissed if you shared our DM convo without asking me first, or even letting me know you were going to. I can see why Ada would and why she did what she did, it’s disrespectful and adversarial.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Ada was also already wary of drag after the respecting pronouns rule announcement, because a number of blahaj users rightfully pointed out drag is still likely a troll. Fluff around and find out basically.

      • First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        It ultimately isn’t surprising. Drag has been very sus from the beginning, drag exhibited a lot of behaviors that made me leery. Though at the time I didn’t say anything since it was only a hunch and most people were just voicing transphobic complaints about pronouns.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    If they follow the rules, they are always welcome in Casual Conversation.

    I do not understand the same reasons to judge them that everyone else seems to. They have never seemed antagonistic.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Its been a while since I saw the posts, but it was not subtle at all; immediate reactionary posts from the same instance all badmouthing someone drag was arguing with, using the same phrasing and sentence structure drag uses.

          • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Stop tolerating their ridiculous neopronoun. It was an obvious fucking troll. Grow a spine and start calling this fucking bullshit out instead of letting it infect the LGBT communities.

            • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Idk fam, I feel like weird use of language kinda pales in comparison to sexual harassment of other users, and the fact that the former is what most people seem to care about with DragonFucker is kinda concerning.

              • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                I didn’t know that that stupid motherfucker sexually harassed anyone. So the former was the only one relevant to my experience.

                I think I’m willing to take a stance on, You can have he him, she her, they them, it, or some mixture of those.

                Generally I just wouldn’t care however seeing that community bend itself into a pretzel over an obvious troll pretty much cemented my feeling on the subject. At some point you’re no longer being tolerant and are just being gullible.

    • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I think Blåhaj handled this person well over all. Even if Drag wad just 100% troll, drag wasn’t being fed in Blåhaj and had to go elsewhere. But also there was always the chance that drag is just someone on a journey or with things to sort out. Some people have completely given up on being any gender and treat it like a joke in an almost nihilistic way. But clearly there’s a line between that and an actual troll.

      Either way, I wouldn’t say that it’s standard heterosexual cisgender behaviour to go as far as Drag did just for the lulz. So maybe one of these days, Drag will have an awakening and remember how no one in the community either fed drag or shunned drag when drag was confused and behaving badly.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I personally don’t think they were a troll but I am also not sure I agree with banning people for not remembering or wanting to use their unusual pronouns.

        But I am not well-educated on the topic of neopronouns so if someone feels like educating me or suggesting some readings I am open to it.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          No one was banned for not rembering drags pronouns or for accidentally getting them wrong.

          People were banned for dismissing the validity of neopronouns or for deliberately and repeatedly getting pronouns wrong.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Was it dismissing or just not understanding? To be honest my recollection is a bit fuzzy.

            I’m a little afraid to be having this conversation lest I be accused of prejudice against trans or nonbinary folks, a prejudice I try my best to fight against. But I don’t even understand the connection there since we already have well-established systems of pronouns for such people.

            Personally, I truly can’t fathom why neopronouns are necessary and while I don’t want to disrespect anyone, they are so uncomfortable to use that it just makes me not want to address someone who uses them… especially when they are implicitly linked to having sex with non-human mythological creatures.

            But maybe I am just ignorant. Drag was my first introduction to this concept. I’d like to learn more about this.

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Was it dismissing or just not understanding?

              Some folk require understanding before they offer acceptance. Those folk will frame it as “just not understanding”. I frame that as lack of acceptance. Acceptance isn’t contingent on understanding. You or I not understanding an aspect of someone elses identity has nothing to do with the validity of their identity.

              If you wish to ask someone questions about their pronouns and identity, you’re welcome to do so, but remember they don’t owe you an answer, and whether they offer you an answer or not, and whether you understand their perspective or not, either way, gatekeeping and invalidating their identity is not on.

              they are so uncomfortable to use that it just makes me not want to address someone who uses them

              That was the other option I offered folk. If someone has stated their pronouns, either use them, or if you can’t bring yourself to use them, don’t engage with the person.

              If the person is trolling, report them. But even if they’re trolling, the above statement still stands. Respect their pronouns or don’t engage with them as you report them.

              • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                How can one accept or reject a thing without understanding what it is they are accepting? Is not immediately changing the way one speaks without a reason or even an explicit request equivalent to denying someone’s identity? I don’t think my discomfort with neopronouns is because I reject anyone’s identity. I don’t even understand what such a person’s identity is. Unlike established pronouns, neopronouns do not have any meaning at all to me because I’ve never heard them before and no one has defined them. What do they signify? I assume something different for each one, so what is it? I’ve always been careful with my language, so using words without a clear understanding of their meaning makes me uncomfortable.

                Language is a very meaningful topic for people. Both for the speaker and the spoken to. We have all been acculturated to speak in a certain way, and to understand the meanings of such speech in a certain way. I don’t think asking people to change the way they speak is as trivial as you seem to imply. Nor is declining to change the way one speaks the same as saying “I reject your identity”, unless such a meaning is intended.

                And of course I understand that someone may not want to have this (or any) conversation. But I also feel that you can’t expect people to change without them understanding why they need to change. Most people hate change, it’s just human nature. So if you choose not to educate people, you’ll have to accept that they remain ignorant until such time as someone takes on that burden.

                • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  I’m trans. Cis people literally can never truly understand my experience or why the things that are important to me are important. Acceptance can’t be contingent on understanding they can never have.

                  Neopronouns are the same. You can work on your own understanding to reduce your discomfort but your discomfort should be your problem, not something you get to force on to others