go $fsck yourself

• Alice in Chairs
• Queers if the Stone Age
• Scone Temple Pilots
• Ho Doubt
• Red Hot Child Peppers

They likely just clicked something like “copy URL” somewhere and that’s what it gave them.

Asphodel, most likely.

Jabba could’ve been NalHutta

To add to that, to effectively use docker and basically anything important for self-hosting is to learn the basics of Linux.

A good resource for that is https://learnlinux.tv/

At first I read the title as

How much pareidolia is too much?

And I was bracing for a fun thread, but then my brain caught up and now I’m disappointed.

I get you, and I agree that the division is done. But that’s also how propaganda works. It takes existing issues and plays on those to make things worse.

What makes you think this is okay to post here? It’s explicitly against the stated rules.

Looking at their post history, I question if this user is actually intentionally trying to sew divide. I don’t see anything positive and only see things that point out really negative stuff and needlessly attacking other users.

I’m going to block this user, and I suggest others do, too.

Yeah, I’m not buying into your trolling. Go somewhere else.

Interesting how you feel the need to disingenuously misrepresent my point.

What registrar was that? Were they as big as Cloudflare? How exactly did they “go tits up”? Isn’t the situation you describe a completely different scope from an individual’s usecase? It’s also an anecdotal point of data without including the full context of how common that situation is. “It happened to me once, and I have heard stories” does not necessarily mean it’s common enough for everyone to prepare for every time. I’ll remain skeptical of the

Mainly, though, I’m not saying it’s a bad idea in total. I just think that for someone who is inexperienced with DNS management and self-hosting, those types of concerns are already unlikely and just keeping the environment simple and cost less has far more value than being prepared for unlikely scenarios. It could even prevent self-inflicted issues by keeping it simple, which would be far more likely than Cloudflare’s infrastructure creating a problem that they have to remediate themselves.

If anything, the true argument for risk mitigation would be to have multiple DNS servers for redundancy.

I just don’t believe that, in this type of usecase, it’s worth pressing for and that there’s more of an argument to keep it simple.

Additionally, you can leave out trying to use your credentials and a hypothetical group of people to make your argument for you. It makes it seem like you’re trying to talk down.

Thanks. It seems it would be ideal to include that information in the post title or body.

@frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml Would you mind adding that context, please?

What’s the context of these words?

Reel like a fishing reel? Reel back from something?

Jig as a dance? A jig tool?

I get that you’re likely exaggerating by saying “it’s no extra work”, but managing another account is markedly extra work. It will also cost extra because Cloudflare does not add any markup for registration, which is why they are the cheapest registrar.

I think the convenience and reduction of cost greatly outweighs the highly unlikely situation where “something goes fucky”. If it does, then what? You can’t make DNS updates for a little while?

The most likely reason to get locked out is billing issues, or maybe you lost your login information or something like that, which is going to be the same risk regardless of who your registrar is. Otherwise you’d have to be involved in some sort of legal issue associated with your domain and that is a much deeper issue than can be solved by simply changing nameservers.

Well, the goal isn’t to just create woolly mammoth-lile creatures by copying characteristics. The goal is to recreate the genome from what genome data we have into a living creature.

It’s not like they are trying to create a sweded version, but take a creature that is already close and change the genes to match.

At least, that’s how I understood it based on the article.

Maybe. Maybe not. Because it’s not explicit, then you’re expecting people to fill in the blank. I’d say there’s more of an argument that most people did not make that assumption.

That’s not how you phrased it, though.

If that was the point, then simply adding “as well” or “too” at the end makes that clear. Without it, it frames it as if the blame is being shifted instead.

When someone robs your house, you blame the robbers. When the police refuse to do anything about it and you get robbed again by the same person 4 years later, you blame the police, too.

You conveniently left out the “Opinion polls” from the first image there. Surely you don’t have some sort of narrative you’re trying to push by manipulating information then relating it to Putin’s dictatorship… Nah. Definitely not.

He clearly bottoms for dictators, though

I noted that this was something added automatically by Ghost, the blogging platform the website is hosted on.

However, ultimately there is no good way to discern if a link like that is not an affiliate link or a non-anonymous tracking link, particularly for the average user. Particularly when the link does not include nofollow on the anchor tag.