The ultimate snowflakes.

On the other hand, there is something to be said for having a small test before joining. I remember Usenet before and after it became accessible to AOL users.

Being called “twits” never put people off Twitter.

The burning issue of billionaires not being rich enough.

Could have been a Friday afternoon one. The one I have is a workhorse that could print on bark using toner made of charcoal and dust.

Oh FFS. Not Brother as well. I used to recommend them to everyone. Who is left with unshittified printers?

Back on to 3d already? The AI bubble hasn’t even popped yet.

It’s the same point but my interpretation makes more sense. You don’t need a 4 panel comic for a simple criticism of ad hominem.

He’s not totally wrong in the first one. You can buy phones that are more ethically produced than Apple ones. There is a choice to get something better, even if it’s not perfect. In the second one there is no choice to get a different one, but there is a choice not to buy one at all. In the third one there is no choice in any way.

What do you think it’s saying? I’m assuming it’s that the guy is using a flawed argument in situations that make it increasingly obvious, with the third one being utterly ridiculous that he thinks it’s a gotcha.

And Philippa Forrester fondling axes while wearing tight leather trousers. Dear god.

I see it as being a progression of that argument from being right in the first one, debatable in the second and completely wrong in the third.

It’s not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that’s not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery. I haven’t seen a “best viewed in Chrome” for a decade or two.

Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.