Nice and open source . Similar performance to Qwen 2.5.
(also … https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-tested-deepseek-vs-qwen-2-5-with-7-prompts-heres-the-winner ← tested DeepSeek vs Qwen 2.5 … )
→ Qwen 2.5 is better than DeepSeek.
So, looks good.

You might have to create it : i made some more search and find nothing precisely as you asked.

Still i found this one is funny :
!iiiiiiitttttttttttt@lemmy.world

.

Thanks to you both :
@almost1337@lemm.ee
and
@FrenziedFelidFanatic@pawb.social

i brought your work back to the original comment thread here :
https://lemmy.world/comment/15515256
.

From :
https://lemmy.world/comment/15525618

@almost1337@lemm.ee
and
@FrenziedFelidFanatic@pawb.social

Nice, comma-separated array of strings for wherever that might be useful ;)

.

Good post about the five eyes, thanks.

Now, about posting here on Lemmy, you may want to know that :

You can edit your post (title, url and header) even after it is posted.

Here a link has this format :
[name](http://abc.def.com/...)

not this :
[[Five Eyes network]()]()

you know my comment is just a copy // paste of original that i linked ? … right ?

complete table
https://lemmy.world/comment/15515256
.

.

You are right I posted that comment too fast before checking and i now corrected and edited my comment with better links.

You are right. So, i just now edited my post to better links.
At first i only gave a look at comparison of specification but then reading the article it’s quite bogus in fact.

Eurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale - Aero Corner
https: // aerocorner (dot) com/ comparison/ eurofighter-typhoon-vs-dassault-rafale
Eurofighter seems better …

Edit : Oops, bad site. See instead :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurofighter_Typhoon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Rafale
.

Canada needs to adopt laws forcing them to display, on on all their pages, a big “submissive to USA” banner.
(… and more broadly, for every product, a “x% tainted by USA’s components” label)

For ordinary folks :
Changing the name of such folders breaks “sharing”. This means that (external) access is then blocked.

There is more in this study than “SafetyCore”

You are getting to this :

A + B → C (metastable and insoluble)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_nucleation_theory
Classical nucleation theory …
Description …
Homogeneous nucleation …

C (metastable) → C(powder precipitate)

… unless you have heterogeneous nucleation
… first you have to eliminate all particle that can be nucleus on which powder can form, then,
… you need to stay away from homogeneous nucleation as described above.
… of course you have to provide a substrate on which C will nucleate, and grow,
… and this is why, in practice, (for large heterogeneous nucleated solids production) this process is very slow.

(…) there is also energy released in reaction, that can cover for decrease in surface energy (…)

Put this into equation or tell me how there is any meaning in this sentence.

You start with a powder ( then, maybe a chemical reaction or dissolution, whatever) and after that you don’t want to end up with a powder.

To go from powder to one solid object, the only energy change is the decrease of surface energy. … you must first see this.

You are trying to put together some words that you think might make sense, but clearly, i am very sorry, but you do not master this domain.
Al2O3 : one process that exists to crystallize this at about room temperature is aluminium oxide purification :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_process Bayer process

… and i told you why it doesn’t work. Alternatively, if you look at stalagmites, you are starting with dissolve salts with slow evaporation. Here you get a solid with good mechanical properties. But this process is very slow. Same idea applies to shells and bones.

if you are talking about cement (like in mortar or concrete), we already have a process to turn powder into solid ceramics at room temperature. Otherwise :

Ca(OH)₂ (powder) + CO₂ → CaCO₃ (powder)