So long as they don’t conflate “Hamas” and “Palestinians”… which they will… so fuck’em.

Starlink is LEO, GPS is not.

Does it spy on you?

All new cars do and this one doesn’t even hide it, it’s called “id everyone”.

Not being an expert it seems as though your setup is windows-centric, whereas KVM tends to shine on linux.

Or headscale.

Ever been down the gemini rabbit hole? It’s not perfect, but quite interesting.

Dozens… yt channels, tech blogs, changelogs, etc

Tracking maybe, but how is the Play Store managing my apps?

And neglect to inform help-desk so they can make fools of themselves when irate customers call.

Don’t use Google Play. Prefer Obtanium, F-Droid or Aurora Store.

But it’s rare for management to press the go-live button on a system that is so woefully unfit for purpose.

I beg to differ.

I.e. M$ doesn’t want people circumventing paywalls, let them use the (magnificent) wayback machine if they want to.

This is news? What are they doing, throwing juniors into server rooms and expect them to learn through looking at blinking lights?

Bittwarden or KeyPassXC are good self-hosteable alternatives.

Is it subtitles in english though?

Couldn’t be arsed to read this, fed the link into an LMM and asked to summarize. This is the result:

Dave Lane’s blog post, “Why ‘free’ proprietary software will always end in tears,” discusses the pitfalls of using proprietary software that is offered for free. He shares a personal story about a scouting group’s experience with a poorly implemented proprietary system and explains how such software often becomes a critical dependency for organizations. This dependency can lead to issues when the software’s limitations or costs become apparent. Lane argues that proprietary software, even when free, often leads to negative outcomes due to its restrictive nature and the control exerted by its developers