• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If they are clever they invest in factories in the east, to hurt the afd electorate

  • Eril@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Still needs a 2/3 majority in the Bundesrat (the “Senate” of germany). The votes should be there, but it is not 100% a given, because of some state governments with mixed opinions. They will vote on it in a session on friday. Let’s hope for the best!

  • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    And Merz and Scholz got their 2/3 majorities via concession of 100 B for environmental measures for the Greens.

    DW called it humorously, " a Defence Package with a Green Stamp".

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It is not „for the greens“ it is for Germany. The environment does not have any political interest.

      • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        DW : " Despite a huge setback in Germany’s federal election, the Green Party has secured a victory to the tune of billions of euros. The future governing coalition needed the Greens to realize a key political goal.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        For 4 years.

        The next government will be beholden to the debt brake again - and if the CDU happens to be in the opposition, they will block any and all investment to make the governing parties look worse.

        Although I expect the AfD to form a blocking minority for constitutional amendments anyway. Maybe we’ll get the first CDU + AfD government by 2029 - wouldn’t be the first time that German conservatives allow nazis to rise to power.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The budget, I mean.

            In four years, I suspect nearly all money will be allocated and either the next government manages to make another constitutional amendment or they will lack founding again.

            500 billion is not a lot for 30 years of infrastructure decay.

            • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes but the next budget can then be done by a simple 51% majority which is the regular coalition. This dept brake change needed a 2/3 vote and lays the foundation for easier budgets in the future.

              • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Are you sure? From everything I read, there is only a 500 billion credit for infrastructure and an exception for defense spending above 1%.

                If the 500 billion credit is largely spent and/or designated by 2029, the next government may not be able to pass a budget without a lot of cuts. Especially because retirement spending will explode by then, taking away money from everything else.

                • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  You are right, the off-budget fund (Sondervermögen) for infrastructure also needed a 2/3 vote. I was under the impression that the 500 billion credit and how it will be spend was just part of the negotiations for the dept brake reform. My bad.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder why the BBC author seems to have explicitly chosen only images with what appears to be female Bundeswehr soldiers? Kinda odd choice 🤔

    • Linke Socke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I only see 2 pics in the Article. Would you also wonder why only Men were showed if there were only 2 pics of Men?

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My money is on subconscious fear of German women. Maybe they grew up on Allo Allo!

        • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m a Pole so I probably didn’t consider German military could be good news or sexy, even subconsciously. But then you have those Hugo Boss uniforms. Hmmmm.

          • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            100% agree with you that military isn’t good or sexy ever but comparing this photo to like a grizzly, manly man in the mud (which could be sexy as well, lol) I think this image wants to say “Look we’re not the reactionary, sexist boys club we once were (which is a complete lie, probably), come join us, we even got women now!” So basicallly propaganda.

            • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I wouldn’t make this judgment based on a single news piece with 2 pictures total but I’ll be on a lookout if this is a pattern.