• drascus@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Duckduckgo is not the problem. They are using publicly scrapable information. So for instance if they have fingerprinted your device they see you go to duckduckgo, then they see you access a site about buying guns, it becomes trivial to determine what you searched for. They would not have direct access to what you search on duckduckgo and duckduckgo is not giving them access. They are using various methods to collect data based on habits. You can use literally any service you want and they could do the same thing.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If that’s true, why bother “monitoring” a search engine? This whole list screams of somebody who knows nothing about tech put out a vague RFP and a contractor pulled a list of “top sites” and used it to justify an egregious proposal cost.

        DOGE, if you’re looking for waste and fraud, perhaps here’s a good source.

        • drascus@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They do it all to build up a huge web of interconnected data points. Duckduckgo itself they might take as evidence that someone is trying to hide something. Then the government goes to a FISA court and gets permission to have other tech companies hand over all your data. Its not any one site its the picture that can be gleamed from all the data available across all the sites.