• TheChickenOfDoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I use GOG to get away from downloading things in the context of a store and have a nice little archive of installers to use whenever I want it. I am trying to get as many Steam games to just be that way so when I run the binary it just works without Steam being involved at all. Laughably few will do it on their own but there are some ways around others…

    Yeah, quite happy without some bloated launcher, thanks.

  • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I think the bigger complaint is that, when Galaxy was released, GOG said (back in 2015)

    A Linux version of our client is planned eventually … Stay tuned for future announcements

    Ten years is plenty of time to implement a launcher, or at least give a planned timeline

    Sure, third parties have done it with Heroic, etc. but promising support and not delivering leaves a really bad taste to me

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      CDProjekt/GOG said the same thing about Cyberpunk 2077, their biggest product ever, and in the year 2025 I’m still running the Windows version of that through Proton because they give no fucks.

      • Zeron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To be fair, you probably don’t want a native version anyways. Most native games i’ve played just required me to switch to proton because they had their own share of issues that the proton versions didn’t have.

        At this point it’s better for devs to make proton support a goal(i.e steam deck compatibility) rather than native linux builds. Linux just has too much diversity for native linux support to not be a massive pain in the ass in my opinion.

        • merdaverse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          True. I’ve had plenty of games where the native version didn’t work, but the Proton version worked flawlessly. Small devs can get more value for their time by aiming for Proton compatibility

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Ten years is plenty of time to implement a launcher, or at least give a planned timeline

      Or to give literally any kind of update, like admitting it was never seriously planned.

  • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Because Linux still makes up a small % of PC Gamers, so CDPR hasn’t prioritized it. Plus they’d need to have some kind of proton-like middleware (or just proton) for the majority of their games (which are mostly 15-20+ years old) to be playable. It seems like a large engineering challenge for a company which isn’t nearly as wealthy as valve

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Proton is open source, they could just use that. Valve would hardly complain as it helps more games run on steamdeck.

      I want to use GoG more but they seem to increasingly not care about Linux. So I use Steam.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “This river doesn’t need a bridge because almost nobody ever crosses it.”

      Also is there a reason they can’t just distribute proton? It’s open under BSD, so they’d be free to do it.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        CD Projekt is a public company, which would likely be cautious in relying on complex third-party tools like Wine.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yep, no public company would ever use Apache, nginx, AWS. Those are all 3rd party tools.

        • Gawdsausage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Most businesses rely on third party tools and software libraries. Particularly open source ones.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Valve isn’t public, but they seem to be making plenty off of WINE. In fact, companies of all types love building on other projects, because it reduces how much work they need to do.

          They just don’t seem to care. They could literally hire someone who works on Heroic to make an official Galaxy port reusing most of Heroic’s functionality. Yet they don’t.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’ve been with linux for 20 years now and at one point GOG was the place to go, because DRM was one of the biggest problems with wine.

    I downloaded all my games stopped using it after they came up with their own electronic store, which I thought was a horrible shit and very clunky on wine.

    Steam and proton were rising at the same time and more and more games were working without the usual fuss of installing .dll files, obscure media codecs, .net and etc, so it was bye bye GOG.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because cdpr is a joke. Like did you see cyberpunks release? All they care is about money they showed that with their rushed job. I haven’t claimed any free games on GOG because you have to sign up for their newsletter in order to claim the game. I still get spammed with emails from GOG even after unsubscribing after I receive every single email. At this point of just marked em’ as spam.

    • hellofriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “rushed job”

      8 years of development

      I don’t know how CP77 turned out how it did, but it certainly wasn’t due to being rushed. Either way, they managed to fix it although it took like 2 years or something.

      As for you still getting GOG emails… Git gud?? Unsubscribing from a service’s emails is the easiest thing in the world if you take roughly 2 seconds to make sure it’s done properly.

      • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah and I fucking unsubscribed and they keep sending me emails and then I unsubscribe again and then they keep sending me emails and then I unsubscribe again and then they keep sending me emails…

        You picking up on it yet?

        And it was in development longer than 8 years it got rumored I can 2011 or something and then the teaser was 2013 I think I forget hold up I’m fuzzy rn. But you can tell it’s a rushed product by the end result. if it needed more time it needed more time end of fucking story

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Heroic Games Launcher, supports gog cloud saves, full wine/proton integration and even store front.

  • stargazingpenguin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to purchase everything I could from GOG until I switched to Linux full time. I still like the company and buy some from them, but until they become more Linux friendly or Steam gets worse I’ll still prioritize Steam now. And it’s not only the (very odd) resistance to making a Linux version of Galaxy, I’ve also seen them not offer Linux versions of games even when the developers have released it on other platforms.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And Linux versions taking over a week longer to update than the steam ones. I refunded a game over that before and got it on steam instead.

    • Kaldo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I tried to push for GOG purchases too and then I just ended up with games that would receive updates late. I’d miss out on discounts and bundles that make future purchases cheaper, at some point it was cheaper to just rebuy stuff with DLCs on Steam than continue building up the library on GOG.

      I also gave their galaxy client a try since it promised a united library for all platforms and then they did a horrible job managing the plugins for other stores - they constantly kept breaking or logging me out while even Playnite worked perfectly out of the box.

      In the end I just stopped wasting energy on GOG, life is too short and complicated enough. If they have a good deal on old games I might grab it, otherwise I prefer anything else.

      • stargazingpenguin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same here. I had nearly all the XCOM2 DLC purchased from GOG, and then Steam ran a sale on the bundle that was cheaper than buying the last piece to complete the collection! Since then I think GOG have run similarly cheap sales, but it wasn’t the last time I saw that happen.

        I know launchers like Heroic are available, and I use it for some of my games from them, but I actually liked the Galaxy launcher on Windows. I wasn’t linking it to anything else though, so I didn’t run into the issues you mention.

        It’s sad, because I think they could do well in the Linux community. Hopefully they eventually start supporting it, but until then I’ll be buying most of my games from the company that’s actively contributing and improving things for the community.

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, they promised Linux support years ago with Galaxy 2.0.
    It’s basically the reason why I always prefer Steam for my games.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Besides what the other person said, there’s also the whole treating Linux users as second class citizens. If they didn’t had a launcher for Windows, then it wouldn’t be that big of a problem, but the fact that they did created a launcher for Windows years ago and porting it to Linux has been the most upvoted feature request since then and they haven’t done it is a slap in the face of a community that shares a lot of their beliefs. Valve is investing money on making Linux gaming a reality, GoG won’t even port their launcher to Linux, despite not caring for a launcher I know who I’m giving my money.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like having all my games in one place, on a platform where Linux “just works” and I don’t have to fuck around with it.

      Eliminating third-party launchers sounds great in theory until you have 20 different half-baked second party launchers that serve no purpose other than being a barrier between me and the games.

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You may not agree, but some people actually like the platform integration features that Galaxy and Steam and the like provide. Cloud sync and achievements and things that you may not care about are important to other people.

      And then there’s just the whole “They said they would, and this is not very reassuring about their commitment to Linux users.”

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If third party launchers were as good as the first party ones, we wouldn’t.

  • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe the author of the article/blog doesn’t know about Heroic?

    They mention lutris, but note that it isn’t a functional equivalent to Galaxy. But as far as I’m aware, Heroic is (correct me if I’m wrong, I haven’t seen Galaxy in action).

    • sibachian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I found Heroic today. Same games that won’t run on Lutris won’t run on Heroic either. The biggest disappointment was that it crashed a few times and I gave up entirely when it froze up. I’m not saying Lutris is flawless, it certainly isn’t, but my experience overall has at least been acceptable.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There’s an open-source CLI client to download GOG games, lgogdownloader. It’s packaged in Debian.

  • Durandal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    IIRC GOG is actually partnered with HeroicLauncher… so… it’s semi official to use that… and better UX.

    • iusearchbtw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      heroic has no download throttling, very annoying for shared/shitty networks and large games

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Affiliate links are not business partnerships. Does Heroic have anything more than that with GOG?

      EDIT: The answer is no, GOG is not partnered with Heroic Games Launcher.

      • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Gog funds Heroic.

        I actually think it’s a fairly decent compromise (although I prefer Lutris), since Gog is clearly not interested in paying to maintain a Linux port.

        EDIT: Wrong(ish)! See below.

        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Gog funds Heroic.

          By some other means than affiliate link payouts? I’m not aware of any such arrangement, but if one exists, can you link some details about it?

          • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I read it somewhere awhile ago. You’re killing me asking for a source, goddamn.

            EDIT: somewhat ironically, here’s a Reddit thread where a developer says they are a part of the affiliate program, so, I don’t know much funding that brings in. It sounds like a less formal arrangement than I was imagining:

            • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yes, that’s what I thought: It’s just affiliate linking (aka marketing) that any app can use, not a partnership between Heroic and GOG. Thanks for following up and confirming it.

              Quoting /u/imLinguin in the post you linked:

              Heroic dev here. We are just part of the affiliate program since we help people access GOG on Linux easier. There is nothing more, so there is no need for official announcements from the GOG side.

              • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I’m glad you called me out on that. It’s easy to misremember when we are just constantly bombarded w information.

                Anyways, it would be a good compromise, imo.

                Curious what Gog’s actual hang up is, since the Steamdeck’s picking up so much momentum.

    • im sorry i broke the code@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Better UX is a big word, as any unofficial launcher it kinda sucks because it doesn’t have a specific feature set. Besides, first party support is always better