• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As a non-user of kitty, why did it make you drop tmux? Don’t they do different jobs?

    • Zangoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Kitty has multiplexing built in so it can also replace a lot of what tmux does (unless you’re using tmux over ssh)

        • KRAW@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          with kitty you can open a new terminal session that sets it’s cwd to the remote directory of the server you’re ssh’d into. Honestly the only thing I can think of that termux can do that kitty can’t is saving sessions

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tmux has probably some specific features Kitty won’t do as good as a native multiplexer? (sorry I’m not the right person to ask this question :s) but It has the features I’m looking for without the need to install one.

      It was quite cumbersome to configure a terminal + a multiplexer on MacOS to behave how I liked it. Kitty solved this issue while being fast, simple and a lot of customization in one single app.

      One feature that was really important, copy/past over SSH with Micro which involved quite a hacky thing with iTerm2 + Tmux.Also being able to split my windows, create tabs…

      But as I said I have only basic use cases and can’t really say If Kitty’s multiplexing features are on par with Tmux. However, during my web search I read about a lot of people far more knowledge than myself who actually switch to kitty from Tmux without regrets !